Section 1 of the Terrorism Act 2000 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Section 1 of the terrorism Act 2000 - Essay ExampleNevertheless, the uncertainty of what constitutes terrorism under international law has manifested at national level with difficulty in distinguishing between state and non-state terrorism (Williamson, 2009). In considering whether the acts in the flow scenario constitute acts of terrorism, this paper will consider the come out under UK law, with specific reference to the act of terrorism Act 2000. Section 1(2) of the Terrorism Act 2000 provides that an act of terrorism includes any act that includes the following (a) involves serious delirium against a person, (b) involves serious damage to a property, (c) endangers a persons life, other than that of a person committing the action (d) creates a serious risk to the wellness and safety of the public or a section of the public, or (e) is designed to seriously interfere with or seriously to disrupt an electronic system (Section 1(2) of the Terrorism Act 2000). ... o, the group of soulfulnesss are part of Abort Abortion and whilst they are not listed as a proscribed organisation under Schedule 2 of the Terrorism Act 2000, the individual acts may nevertheless constitute acts of terrorism under section 1 of the Terrorism Act 2000 and this paper shall consider for each one act in turn. 2 Alisons liability for sending photos of aborted foetuses to the doctors who have been previously targeted. Alisons campaign of sending the photos to the doctors whilst unpleasant hasnt caused serious damage to person or property and it will difficult for this conduct to fall within the other sections of section 1(2) to constitute an act of terrorism under the Terrorism Act 2000. Additionally, the photos have been sent merely as a reminder of the horrors of abortion, with no specific threat. However, it is possible that Alison could face liability for harassment under the protective cover from Harassment Act 1997. Section 1(1) of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 provides that individuals must not engage in conduct which a) Amounts to harassment of another and b) Which they know or ought to objectively know constitutes harassment (Section 1(1) of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997). The test for determining harassment is objective and Section 2(1) of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 provides that if an individuals act constitutes harassment in line with the section 1(1) definition, the conduct will constitute a criminal offence. If we apply this by analogy to the current scenario, it is evident that the photos have been sent to the doctors before and that they have been targeted. The images are disturbing and as the photos have been sent repeatedly, there are strong grounds for Alisons conduct constituting harassment under